Page 83 - 360.revista de alta velocidad Nº3
P. 83

Reseñas de Libros, Artículos y Publicaciones                  número 3. octubre 2015

                      examining models in which values of key parameters are varied to see in what
                      circumstances benefits exceed costs, and secondly looking at the limited evidence from ex
                      post studies, mainly for  France  and  Spain. We then turn to British experience of the
                      appraisal of HS2 – the proposed line linking London to Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds. It
                      is concluded that the main factors determining economic success for high speed rail projects
                      are construction costs, value of time saving per passenger and traffic volume and degree of
                      congestion  of existing transport networks. The biggest uncertainty regarding  the case for
                      high speed rail surrounds the possibility of wider economic benefits.
                      Keywords: High speed rail; Investment; Appraisal


                       Krishnan,  V. Kastrouni, E.  V. Pyrialakou, D. Gkritza,  K. McCalley, J.D. An
                         optimization model  of energy and transportation systems: Assessing the high-
                         speed rail  impacts in the United States,  Transportation Research Part C:
                         Emerging Technologies, Volume 54, May 2015, Pages 131-156, ISSN 0968-090X,
                         http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.007.

                      (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X15000868)
                      Abstract: This  paper presents  a long-term  investment planning model that co-optimizes
                      infrastructure investments and operations across transportation and electric infrastructure
                      systems for  meeting the energy and transportation needs in the United States. The
                      developed passenger transportation model is integrated within the modeling framework of a
                      National Long-term Energy and Transportation Planning (NETPLAN) software, and the model
                      is applied to investigate  the impact  of high-speed rail (HSR) investments on interstate
                      passenger transportation portfolio, fuel and electricity consumption, and 40-year cost and
                      carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The results show that there are feasible scenarios under
                      which significant HSR penetration can be achieved, leading  to reasonable decrease  in
                      national long-term CO2 emissions and costs. At higher HSR penetration of approximately 30%
                      relative to no HSR in the portfolio promises a 40-year cost savings of up to $0.63 T, gasoline
                      and jet  fuel consumption reduction  of up to 34% for  interstate  passenger trips,  CO2
                      emissions  reduction  by about 0.8  billion short tons, and  increased resilience against
                      petroleum price shocks. Additionally, sensitivity studies with respect to light-duty vehicle
                      mode  share reveal that in order to realize such long-term cost and emission benefits,  a
                      change in the passenger mode choice is essential to ensure higher ridership for HSR.
                      Keywords: National infrastructure planning; Energy and transportation infrastructure
                      optimization; Multimodal passenger transportation; High-speed rail; Sustainability;
                      Resilience


                       Delaplace, M. Dobruszkes, F. From low-cost airlines to low-cost high-speed rail?
                         The French case, Transport Policy, Volume 38, February 2015, Pages 73-85, ISSN
                         0967-070X, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.12.006.

                      (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X15000025)
                      Abstract: This paper explores  OUIGO  (pronounced  ‘we go’), the low-cost high-speed rail
                      (HSR) service launched by the French state-owned railways in April 2013. In this exploration,
                      we (1) compare OUIGO with the traditional French HSR and the low-cost airlines (LCAs), and
                      (2) analyse fares proposed by OUIGO and its competitors. We thus analyse the new service in
                      terms  of production conditions, communication,  marketing, booking, network geography,
                      at-terminal and on-board experience and fares. We find that the railway industry’s
                      constraints (including  market regulations, technical rigidities and incumbent employment




                                                              81
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88